Analysis of Structural, Optical, Morphological and Magnetic Behaviour of Lead Nanoferrite by Two Different Methods

  • A. Subashini Research Scholar Marudhar Kesari Jain College for Women, Vaniyambadi, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1614-3662
  • C. Pavithra Head & Assistant Professor Marudhar Kesari Jain College for Women, Vaniyambadi, Tamil Nadu, India
Keywords: Nanoferrites, Sol Gel Method, Hydrothermal Route, Comparative Method

Abstract

Sol gel and the hydrothermal approach are two distinct techniques that have been successfully used to synthesise lead nanoferrite (PbFe2O4). To determine which of the two approaches is superior, the features of the sample prepared by each have been examined. Vibration Sample Magnetometer (VSM), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, UV-VIS Spectral investigations, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-Ray Diffraction, and Size, Band Gap Energies, Morphology, and Magnetic Properties of Nanostructures were used to determine and compare its various aspects.
The mean diameters of the synthesised lead ferrite nanocrystalline were found to be 33 nm for the sol gel method and 20 nm for the hydrothermal method, respectively, based on X-Ray Diffraction analysis using Debye-Scherer’s formula with the peak. FTIR spectra are used to analyse the
vibration characteristics of nanomaterials. The optical characteristics of the synthesised nanomaterials, such as their Energy Band Gap, were determined using UV-VIS Spectral investigations. SEM is used for surface morphological investigations, allowing the structure of the synthesised nanomaterials to be studied. Using VSM, the magnetisation of the produced nanomaterials was examined, and the hysteresis loops were used to calculate the saturation magnetisation (Ms), coercivity (Hc), and retainivity (Mr).

Published
2024-10-01
Statistics
Abstract views: 20 times
PDF downloads: 7 times
Section
Articles